[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Inaccuracy of smolt i586 count - was 586 kernels.



On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 01:51:48PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 11:57:39AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >  
> >>>post F7 upgrade (meaning I didn't check beforehand) uname -m and arch
> >>>report i686. Smolt also sees this as an i686 - in fact the complete
> >>>profile is at
> >>>      
> >>Whats the right way to determine the arch of the box?
> >>    
> >
> >uname -m
> >
> >However for the "gcc 686" as opposed to "Intel/AMD 686" you must also check
> >that cmov is available. Basically smolt is right gcc is wrong 8)
> >  
> 
> I guess I could look at it another way, what info can I grab so its 
> useful to the developers to make decisions about this stuff :)

Isn't all of /proc/cpuinfo transmitted? Maybe a finer grained stats on
cpu family/model/flags under the "CPU" tag?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgp63OX9daeOi.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]