RPATH status

[Callum Lerwick]

On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 20:01 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> If this is the same thought as past discussions, the whitelist is per
> package.  I make a build.  The rpms are run through rpmlint.  The issues
> reported are compared against the previous build's rpmlint.  If there
> are problems not previously whitelisted, the rpm is not pushed to the
> repo until the maintainer somehow adds the warnings to the whitelist or
> updates the spec so it no longer causes the error. (Maybe it's filling
> in a reason and submitting it to the packageDB.  Maybe it's a specially
> formatted comment in the spec file.  I don't know how people would want
> to implement the feature.)

I thought there's already a whitelist. There's (W)arnings and (E)rrors.
Just like a C compiler.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070310/3c113d80/attachment.sig>