[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Yum-presto (deltarpms) ready for testing.



On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 19:22 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> >>
> >> Download Size (without DRPM),Download Size (with DRPM),Percentage 
> >> Savings,Total Percentage Savings
> >> 493372,132236,74,74
> >> 509267102,126959924,76,76
> 
> Additional note: This log is being written only at the very end and if 
> the transaction fails in between I suspect nothing will get written at 
> all. Yum does log incrementally which is more useful.  Also the format 
> is not easy to read and you should probably switch to something more 
> standard that can be parsed better by logwatch.
> 
Okay, what are you thinking?  I'd be happy to change the format (I chose
csv for easy machine parsing), but I'm not sure what people would like
to see.
> > I think our best bet is to get it included into Extras (which may be a
> > bit of a struggle if I'm to maintain it as I don't maintain any other
> > packages).  We should then talk with Fedora Infrastructure and see if
> > they're interested in creating Presto repositories.  If we don't run
> > into any major problems during the F7/Rawhide timeline, maybe we can get
> > it installed and enabled by default for F8.  (Though I will definitely
> > use it during the whole FC6/F7 timeline.)
> 
> Yes, the next step would be to get into Fedora Extras, get mirrors and 
> get more feedback. I am using the plugin on my main FC6 box now.
Sweet!  Maybe this is the wrong place, but how do I go about getting
yum-presto into Fedora Extras?
> 
> Rahul
> 
> 
Jonathan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]