Gérard Milmeister wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 21:03 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:I got looking into this because of these review requests: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 And I've come to the conclusion that we need some kinda ocaml packaging guidelines. Interesting with regards to this are: http://docs.pld-linux.org/ocaml.html http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_packaging_policy.txtMaybe you could start an add something to the fedoraproject wiki, for example a Ocaml SIG. There has also been some interest in this by Richard Jones <rjones redhat com>.
Thanks for alerting me to this Gerard.I did post to caml-list a while back about the lack of a comprehensive range of OCaml packages in Fedora (versus the case with Debian, for example, where the supported packages are both comprehensive and of very high quality).
I didn't get much response, but I'd really like to help out.At my previous company I wrote and maintained a great deal of OCaml software: http://merjis.com/developers
Rich. -- Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/ 64 Baker Street, London, W1U 7DF Mobile: +44 7866 314 421 Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David Owens (Ireland)
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature