[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Proposal ocaml guidelines

Gérard Milmeister wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 21:03 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
I got looking into this because of these review requests:

And I've come to the conclusion that we need some kinda ocaml
packaging guidelines.

Interesting with regards to this are:

Maybe you could start an add something to the fedoraproject wiki, for
example a Ocaml SIG. There has also been some interest in this by
Richard Jones <rjones redhat com>.

Thanks for alerting me to this Gerard.

I did post to caml-list a while back about the lack of a comprehensive range of OCaml packages in Fedora (versus the case with Debian, for example, where the supported packages are both comprehensive and of very high quality).

I didn't get much response, but I'd really like to help out.

At my previous company I wrote and maintained a great deal of OCaml software: http://merjis.com/developers


Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
64 Baker Street, London, W1U 7DF     Mobile: +44 7866 314 421

Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom.
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David
Owens (Ireland)

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]