[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Proposal ocaml guidelines



Gérard Milmeister wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 21:03 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
I got looking into this because of these review requests:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815

And I've come to the conclusion that we need some kinda ocaml
packaging guidelines.

Interesting with regards to this are:
http://docs.pld-linux.org/ocaml.html
http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_packaging_policy.txt

Maybe you could start an add something to the fedoraproject wiki, for
example a Ocaml SIG. There has also been some interest in this by
Richard Jones <rjones redhat com>.

Yes an ocaml sig probably is a good idea. But as said I'm only the reviewer here, so to those interested, go ahead create a sig. Maybe Nigel Jones will want to join you too, as he is the submitter of the package review requests linked to above.

Either way we need to put down some guidelines, since the current ocaml packages aren't packaged properly (when judging them by the debian / PLD guidelines).

Regards,

Hans


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]