[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Selinux and package guidelines



On So Mai 6 2007, dragoran wrote:

> but it would be better to clean up before aproving a package (if a
> selinux expert is needed cc one in the review request)
> we should do something like "works with selinux enforcing ->no please
> fix first" during the review

Please update the documentation about selinux and packaging[1] first, 
currently, there is not much help to allow e.g. execmod for a file in a 
package. Without proper documentation, your demand seems not to be very wise 
to me.
Also does rpm not support a packager very much to use selinux afaik. When one 
needs two extra files and more than 15 lines of scriptlets for only making 
some files "textrel_shlib_t", it is not much helpful. Imho something like

%textrel_shlib_t /path/to/libpackage.so

in %files should be enough, because it contains all the information that is 
needed (the lib should have textrel_shlib_t) and everything else can be 
automatically. 

Regards,
Till


[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]