[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: F7 Zope package



Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 07 May 2007 13:53:26 -0600, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
>
>   
>> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>     
>>> On Mon, 07 May 2007 10:55:08 -0500, David G. Mackay wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 19:40 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> There is no zope and no plone for Fedora 7. We've removed the rpms from
>>>>> the development repository some time ago on the package owner's request.
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Sorry to hear that they were removed.  If you need the functionality
>>>> provided by Zope, then I don't know of any other open source product
>>>> that comes close.
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> You refer to the old builds for Fedora 6, which have continued to
>>>>> live in the development repo for some time.
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> I refer to the rpms that were on the F7-t3 dvd.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Yes, an old FC-6 zope from Aug 30th, 2006, and older than the current FC-6
>>> package. The spec in Fedora Extras CVS has not been touched since then.
>>>   
>>>       
>> It wouldn't build. Why should I update it? (I actually asked and was
>> told it was a waste of my time)
>>     
>
> Why would you keep and offer old builds which don't work?
>   

I'm sorry. I am new to the Fedora infrastructure. I didn't know what to
do right away. I requested the remove when it was addressed to me. I
half hoped there would be a solution that would not require me to remove
the builds. Anyways, they are removed.

> My initial reply was about this:
>
> | It was nice to see that zope is one of the packages available for
> | installation in F7. 
>
> The old builds ought to have been removed before the release of F7T1.
>   

Yes, I'm sorry I didn't promptly give up on things.

> Both zope and plone have been in the broken upgrade paths report for a
> long time without that FESCo has been made aware of the problem with
> Python 2.5.
>   

FESCo would have been notified at the same time I was... At lest I had
expected. This might be a flawed assumption on my part.

Extras Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64 Sat Feb  3 07:41:25 CST
2007 is the first I was aware of the possible issue, other then my devel
branch not building.

It was directly requested I removed the packages on April 10th. After
trying to get compat packages included I gave up and finally requested
the removal.

> Further, do the release notes cover the removal yet?
> (searching the Wiki I don't think they do)
>   

I don't personally know. I don't think it will make it into the on-image
release notes but I would expect something to be added to the wiki?

Jonathan Steffan


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]