[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: kernel package



On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 09:53 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 12:49 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 10:50 +0200, Oliver Falk wrote:
> > > A question; Before I open BZ... Is the kernel team (I see Dave Jones is 
> > > doin' much; that's why CC:) willing to help AlphaCore and add patches to 
> > > kernel spec?
> > > 
> > > No, it's nothing for upstream. Just fixes for the spec. Some 
> > > if(n)arch's, sections for alpha, a config, ... Nothing that should break 
> > > primary archs...
> > 
> > We don't like ifarches. Why?
> 
> The utrace patch is the biggest concern here, really. Not that it's bad
> code, but its a significant divergence from upstream, and it doesn't
> work on sparc32 (and presumably, alpha). Aurora is %ifarch
> conditionalizing that patch (and one later patch that has to be modified
> slightly for the old ptrace behavior) in our kernels as well.

Does it apply?  Seems there's a config option for it... you could just
leave that disabled in your .configs.

josh


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]