[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rpms/xchat/devel xchat.spec,1.63,1.64



On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 10:36 -0400, Kevin Kofler wrote: 
> Summary:   A popular and easy to use graphical IRC (chat) client
>  Name:      xchat
>  Version:   2.8.2
> -Release:   2%{?dist}
> +Release:   3%{?dist}
>  
> -Provides:    xchat-perl, xchat-python, xchat-tcl
> -Obsoletes:   xchat-perl, xchat-python, xchat-tcl
> +Provides: xchat-perl = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
> +Obsoletes: xchat-perl < %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
> +Provides: xchat-python = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
> +Obsoletes: xchat-python < %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
> +Provides: xchat-tcl = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
> +Obsoletes: xchat-tcl < %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}

> %changelog
> +* Mon May 28 2007 Kevin Kofler <Kevin tigcc ticalc org> - 1:2.8.2-3
> +- use versioned Provides/Obsoletes to allow future package split
> +

Does it really make sense to create sub-packages for the perl & python
plugins in the future?  It's not like the plugins are especially large,
or that most systems won't have python & perl already installed.

Later,
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple fedoraproject org>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]