For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora

Christopher Blizzard blizzard at redhat.com
Wed May 30 23:20:03 UTC 2007


On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 17:41 -0400, David Woodhouse wrote:
> 
> Also, please keep the explicit assurance that PowerPC won't be shifted
> to 'secondary' status before one other architecture has shown that it
> can work.
> 

I think that this is a separate topic from the larger secondary arch
disucssion?  Whether or not PowerPC is on that list or not?

--Chris




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list