Documentation

[Paul W. Frields]

On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 00:08 +0900, Marc Wiriadisastra wrote:
> Hey all,
> 
> Just wanted your thoughts on something relating to documentation.  I had a
> read of
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-daa717ea096fa4d9cf7b9a49b5edb36e3bda3aac
> relating specifically to the documentation aspect.  Basically I was
> looking at  packaging Diveintopython.
> 
> http://www.diveintopython.org/index.html
> 
> There is no clear guideline except for will it improve the user
> experience.  To me thats fairly ambiguous as to what is considered
> improving the user experience.  It's probably worded that way specifically
> for a reason to not limit what goes in.

The guidelines specifically state in the examples following that
documentation is permissible.

I thought about packaging this myself and never got around to it.  If
you decide to do this, let me know.  If you decide *not* to do this,
please also let me know. :-)

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
           Fedora Project: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20071117/1347b516/attachment.sig>