Review queue/FESCo after the merge

[Hans de Goede]

Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl) said: 
>> Christopher Aillon wrote:
>>> * Make sure that there are no cases of Requires(pre,post)
>> Erm, why isn't the use of those perfectly "legal"
> 
> As I understand it, Requires(pre) is OK, Requires(post) is OK,
> Requires(pre,post) is not.
> 

Ah,

Yes I actually knew that, but I didn't read it that way, oops.

Regards,

Hans