[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Changing the rpm default queryformat to include arch



On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 08:28 +0100, nodata wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 22.11.2007, 17:00 -0600 schrieb Callum Lerwick:
> > On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:49 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > > To put it shortly, I going to switch the default rpm queryformat to 
> > > include package architecture (ie what you get now with
> > > rpm -q --qf "%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n") in a few days or 
> > > so.
> > 
> > Not %{name}-%|epoch?{%{epoch}:}|%{version}-%{release}.%{arch} ? :)
> That would encourage the use of epochs.

I don't think so -- "Look, this package has an epoch, I'll add that to
my package too"? Hardly. If I'm interested in the version of a package,
I'm interested in the epoch, too, if there's one. IMO, the only reason
against listing the epoch here is that RPM itself doesn't understand it
when specifying packages:

nils wombat:~> rpm -q gimp-2:2.4.1-1.fc8.x86_64
package gimp-2:2.4.1-1.fc8.x86_64 is not installed
nils wombat:~> rpm -q gimp-2.4.1-1.fc8.x86_64
gimp-2.4.1-1.fc8

Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp redhat com
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
 Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."  --  B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]