[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: The gstreamer third way



On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 11:26 +0100, Andy Green wrote:

>  - Additionally, completely externally, some other repo might offer a
> standalone GPL3 samba libs package that has the same soname that
> endusers might choose to use to replace Fedora's GPL2 library.  That's
> up to them and the user's problem that his combined system may not be
> redistributable if he goes down that path.
> 
> If I understood it, this does not violate any terms or intention of the
> terms and is nice and clean.

Why are we, as a Free Software community, spending time looking for new
and interesting ways to violate Samba's licence, in fact or in spirit?

Just because people have created a history of non-compliance with the
kernel's licence for convenience does not make me any more comfortable
with this thread's direction.  

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]