[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: should readahead allow generic paths?



> without readahead (0:49):
> with tweaked readahead (updated/sorted lists, run earlier) (0:44):

> so, it's a small win for me.  The approach still feels a bit inelegant
> to me, but it does seem to save a bit if it's done properly.  But from
> above, if it's done wrong, it hurts a lot more than it helps.
                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 Yes, I agree ;-(

> Tossing a default list out there and hoping for the best probably won't
> work, at any rate.

 I'm going to generate new default lists and apply your patches
 tomorrow. I'll minimize number of files in these lists -- it means no
 more gnome and firefox.

 Thanks for your effort and enthusiasm! :-)

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak redhat com>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]