Provides/Obsoletes question
Jos Vos
jos at xos.nl
Tue Oct 16 16:35:25 UTC 2007
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:22:57PM +0200, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 18:14 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Additionally, "<= 0.11-2" is insufficient since 0.11-2.fc8 is
> > "higher" due to the %dist tag.
>
> Exactly!
>
> This is not the first case of this. Please _never_ write Obsolete tags
> that contain "<=". This doesn't play well with dist tags and removes the
> possibility of updating the package in older releases. Avoid this
> useless construct in case you want to see your fedora being updated
> cleanly with yum :)
At least "<= 0.11" would be better, as this covers all "releases", but
in many cases the version/release of the package that is obsoleted
does not matter at all, you just want to obolete something else.
In RHEL5 (probably also in Fedora), pidgin obsoletes "gaim < 999:1"
(epoch 999 !!!). If someone can explain me why this is better than
just obsoleting "gaim", please tell me. IMHO, this only makes sense
if a "gaim >= 999:1" might ever exist. I don't think so :-).
--
-- Jos Vos <jos at xos.nl>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list