Request for Comments: Proposed changes to Fedora development cycle

[Hans de Goede]

Mike McGrath wrote:
> Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:05:51 +0200
>>> Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So all in all:
>>>> -calling it alpha / beta / release candidate instead of test# +1
>>>> -no freeze for alpha +1
>>>> -early branching (I would say a week for the RC) +1
>>>> -making builds in the release branch goto updates-testing after
>>>>   branching -1 (esp combined with early branching)
>>>
>>> Good, discussion!
>>>
>>> Here is the problem, if the build is not deemed "good" by rel-eng to be
>>> in the release after the release candidate where does it go?
>>
>> Why does this deeming good have to be done by rel-eng? Thats creating 
>> both a bottle-neck and a hoop to jump through.
> 
> Someone has to do it, who?
> 

How about the maintainer?

Regards,

Hans