Multiarch crazyiness
Richard W.M. Jones
rjones at redhat.com
Mon Oct 22 08:52:20 UTC 2007
Jon Masters wrote:
> It obviously was a kludge. And a great one - Jeremy, Bill, and other
> *smart* people (so don't get me wrong guys!) had to come up with a
> solution at some point when this came up, but it's long since time to
> take a big breath and think about a longer term fix.
>
> Can we agree that needs to happen? If so, I'll happily actually get
> involved in implementing a fix, as I've said to these folks in face to
> face conversations about multilib before!
Why don't we just install 64 bit packages (on x86-64)[1]? I've been
running Fedora 7 & 8 systems like this for ages without any problems. I
can't see why it isn't the default, with kludges only for the people who
want 32 bit packages on their shiny 64 bit processor.
Rich.
[1] Or just 32 bit packages on ppc64.
--
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in
England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3237 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20071022/867c40cd/attachment.bin>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list