Should we settle on one SSL implementation?

[Robert Relyea]

Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 10:29:17AM -0700, Robert Relyea wrote:
>   
>> If MD4 is one of the algorithms,  We have a plan for that. MD4 is 
>> fundamentally broken, has been for 10 years. There is only one legitimate 
>> use of MD4 that I know of and that is support NTLM (Microsoft's old NT 
>> authentication mechanism). In this case we need a common NTLM library that 
>> all NTLM users call. Any other use of MD4 needs to be identified and 
>>     
>
> There is libntlm existing:
> http://josefsson.org/libntlm/
>   
Thanks, We should take a look at it. At this point there are a number of 
ntlm libraries, mostly imbedded in various applications (mozilla, samba, 
etc.). This does have the advantage of being a separate package, though.

bob
> --
> Pat
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3420 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20071023/b18c2ae4/attachment.bin>