[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: firefox-2.0.0.8 Upgrade Problems in F7



On 10/24/07, Richi Plana <myfedora richip dhs org> wrote:
> As for the second issue (delaying non-essential updates which break), if
> we look at the most common use-case, we have the ff. actors: the package
> maintainer for the package that breaks (A), the package maintainer/s for
> the package that depend on the breaking one (B), and the users who do
> "yum update"s (C). It's my contention that (A)'s update should be
> delayed pending the resolution of (B)'s packages or a certain amount of
> time has passed. I won't even begin to argue who is responsible for
> coordinating with who ((A) or (B)). I just believe that (C) shouldn't
> have to be involved.
>
> And yes, I can't wait till xulrunner is its own separate package.
> --
>
> Richi Plana
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]