catching broken deps

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Oct 25 14:18:32 UTC 2007


On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:06:11 +0200
Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> wrote:

> Not at the moment, but before sinking time into this I would first
> like to see some commitment to / interest in checks like these.

I don't think anybody is going to say no to adding some checks in to at
least warn a maintainer that the build they submitted may cause
problems.  I don't think we want to fail any builds yet, especially
since we don't have an easy way to "unfail" the build.  So
informational only.

> 
> If we are going to do this I have a few questions:
> -What languages would be acceptable to write such checks in?

Python would be preferred.

> -What kind of access to the repository for which is being build is
> available on the buildsys. (mirror mounted as filesystem / yum
> only / ..)

Within the buildroot itself there should be access to the build
repository, but this doesn't necessarily match the released repos.  My
best recommendation would be to construct a yum object and point to a
known local repo (http) to gather repodata information.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20071025/c40f9cb7/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list