[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rawhide report: 20070904 changes



On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 15:19 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 07:45 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 05:09 -0400, Build System wrote:
> >>
> >>> Broken deps for i386
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> >>> 	openalpp - 20060714-3.fc7.i386 requires libOpenThreads.so.1
> >>> 	osgal - 20060903-3.fc7.i386 requires libosgDB.so.1
> >>> 	osgal - 20060903-3.fc7.i386 requires libosgFX.so.1
> >>> 	osgal - 20060903-3.fc7.i386 requires libosgParticle.so.1
> >>> 	osgal - 20060903-3.fc7.i386 requires libosgProducer.so.1
> >>> 	osgal - 20060903-3.fc7.i386 requires libosgSim.so.1
> >>> 	osgal - 20060903-3.fc7.i386 requires libosgGA.so.1
> >>> 	osgal - 20060903-3.fc7.i386 requires libOpenThreads.so.1
> >>> 	osgal - 20060903-3.fc7.i386 requires libosgText.so.1
> >>> 	osgal - 20060903-3.fc7.i386 requires libosg.so.1
> >>> 	osgal - 20060903-3.fc7.i386 requires libosgUtil.so.1
> >>> 	osgcal - 0.1.44-4.fc7.i386 requires libosgDB.so.1
> >>> 	osgcal - 0.1.44-4.fc7.i386 requires libosgFX.so.1
> >>> 	osgcal - 0.1.44-4.fc7.i386 requires libosgParticle.so.1
> >>> 	osgcal - 0.1.44-4.fc7.i386 requires libosgProducer.so.1
> >>> 	osgcal - 0.1.44-4.fc7.i386 requires libosgSim.so.1
> >>> 	osgcal - 0.1.44-4.fc7.i386 requires libosgGA.so.1
> >>> 	osgcal - 0.1.44-4.fc7.i386 requires libOpenThreads.so.1
> >>> 	osgcal - 0.1.44-4.fc7.i386 requires libosgText.so.1
> >>> 	osgcal - 0.1.44-4.fc7.i386 requires libosg.so.1
> >>> 	osgcal - 0.1.44-4.fc7.i386 requires libosgUtil.so.1
> >>> 	
> >> Heh, the two programs above are really getting annoying seeing them on
> >> the rawhide build email everyday.  Any chance these are getting rebuilt
> >> or fixed soon?
> > 
> > osgcal, osgal and openalpp are victims of the OpenSceneGraph-2 API
> > changes.
> > 
> > I already had proposed an approach to keep these programs (Downgrade
> > OpenSceneGraph to OSG-1 and to add an OpenSceneGraph2 package), but
> > feedback so far had been more or less non-exitant
> > 
> 
> Thats not completely true, you did get feedback from several people including 
> me, and I agree with Mike that these breakages are getting very annoying and 
> should be fixed soon.
I am not in a position to fix them. ACLs, conventions

> Let me repeat my solution of when you asked howto downgrade:
> 1) Make the main OpenSceneGraph package OpenSceneGraph 1.x again, using epoch
>     to fix version issues.
Won't help any of the packages, because they would still BR the wrong
versions. i.e. these packages would not survive a rebuild without manual
intervention.

> 2) Add a new OpenSceneGraph2 package
Non-applicable without epoch bump or rel-eng intervening.

> 3) Make the devel's conflict each other if doing an other solution turns out to
>     be a lot of work.
The devel packages would Conflict in any case, because the OSG-devel
packages can't be made installable in parallel without major effort.

> Solved.
I didn't say it wasn't solvable. 

I was hoping for ways to avoid the epoch bump, or the maintainers of the
packages above would have the insight to acknowledge their packages to
be dead rsp. them to upgrade them to OSG2. 

To me, it doesn't make real sense to keep them.

Ralf



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]