[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: ubuntu bulletproof x



Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 14:53 -0500, Douglas McClendon wrote:
Adam Jackson wrote:
Yeah, okay, force me to clarify.  Grumble.

There are cases where we can't tell what monitor the user has.  They're
almost completely described by "either the card can't do DDC, or the
cable is broken".  The former is a vanishingly small class of hardware,
voodoo1 basically.  The latter happens depressingly often particularly
with projector setups.

So, to save you the trouble of rereading all of my posts. Can you explicitly confirm this (which it sounds like you did, but not in a way that clearly addressed the point I tried to make half a dozen times last night).

Repeat after me-

"There is *NEVER* a situation, when the monitor fails to provide correct information, due to a broken or absent edid implementation, and which at the same time, sufficient information could be parsed from the .inf that came on the CD with the monitor, to provide the user, a reasonable experience requiring no user interaction beyond putting the cd in the drive". (and at which time, the X driver could not have accomplished the same thing automatically without the .inf)

Absent EDID in the sink device never happens anymore.  It's a
requirement for Vista certification.  I'm fairly sure it was required
for XP cert.  It's a requirement for shipping any DVI sink device.  It
is _mandatory_.

We can fail to get EDID, either because the cable broke the DDC pins, or
timing bugs in the I2C code, or BIOS bugs if we're using VBE DDC, or
it's a really old monitor, or there's a crap KVM switch in the middle,
or phase of the moon, or whatever.

I have not found ISOs for every OEM CD for every monitor that ever
shipped.  I doubt I ever could.  Therefore the following claim is merely
statistical.  However, on no OEM CD that I've ever found does the
included INF file - or any other resource intended to be parsed by the
machine - provide the same set of information as the EDID block for the
monitor.  It may provide a subset.  The only subset I've ever seen is
sync ranges.

I'm not saying I'm happy about that.  I would love to see a
counterexample.  But it's all the empirical evidence I have.

Just wanted to thank you for writing such informative emails. Everytime I read one of your emails I learn something about X, and that's awesome.

-denis


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]