[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Announcing rpmfusion



Chris Jones wrote:
> Also, +1 to the fact its not as good a news as if ATrpms had also been
> incorporated. If rpmfusion and ATrpms turn out as (in)compatible as say
> livna and ATrpms are now, then on a practical level the merger is no
> where near as useful as it could have been.

Yeah, +10 to it being nowhere as good as if ATrpms were included in the
merger, since the bulk of the overlap/conflicts in the 3rd-party repo
world are between livna and ATrpms. Now they'll just be between
rpmfusion and ATrpms. Suck. End-users still lose.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jwilson redhat com


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]