[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [RFC] /var versus /srv



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:17:39 -0400
Steve Grubb <sgrubb redhat com> wrote:

> On Wednesday 26 September 2007 17:59:34 Richi Plana wrote:
> > If there's any interest, I could make spec files (based off of the
> > latest SRPM) for one of these packages to move the data directory
> > from /var to /srv. Just let me know which packages you find
> > interesting and I'll submit the spec file to the package maintainer
> > (or here if Fedora doesn't want to move it).
> 
> AFAIK, selinux only knows about a couple servers, like apache, having
> data in /srv. If SE Linux is going to protect the data, a standard
> mapping between /srv and /var for everything should be worked out so
> that policy can be adapted.

SELinux doesn't care about file paths.  If the directories have the right context labels, it doesn't matter where they are.
- -- 
Lamont Peterson <lamont gurulabs com>
Senior Instructor
Guru Labs, L.C. [ http://www.GuruLabs.com/ ]

NOTE:  All messages from this email address should be digitally signed with my
       0xDC0DD409 GPG key. It is available on the pgp.mit.edu keyserver as
       well as other keyservers that sync with MIT's.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG+xwn+YBsl9wN1AkRAsDIAJsG7A6/Rbyml4EMK+9cnG+KxTOz1gCfehWl
HAFb5/W/WgBGG+WSOXk1yVA=
=cRF8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]