[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora spin from RpmFusion

Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:32:42 -0400
Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 16:09 -0600, Lamont Peterson wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:01:32 -0400
> > Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com> wrote:
> > >  Changing that probably means committing to partitioning changes
> > > sooner
> > 
> > I not sure that it would.  After all, yum can deal with swapping
> > CDs and it will ask you for whichever one it wants next, which
> > should also work for multiple-DVD installs as long as there isn't
> > an assumption of how many discs a DVD can install can be.  
> The problem is that we have to mount and look at the additional CDs to
> get their metadata and know what packages are available there.  And to
> do that, we have to transfer stage2 elsewhere.  To RAM kind of sucks
> because it increases the memory requirements by the size of stage2
> (~100M) in a case where we're going to need more memory for package
> metadata and dep solving.  Hence, the hard drive, hence partitioning
> being committed sooner.

So, even if it's another 200MB of RAM, is there anything wrong with saying, "If you want to include 'add-on' discs, you need to have X amount of RAM minimum to do the install." ??  After all, I only have 2 machines with less than a GB of RAM anymore (and I wouldn't do add-on discs with those, anyway).
- -- 
Lamont Peterson <lamont gurulabs com>
Senior Instructor
Guru Labs, L.C. [ http://www.GuruLabs.com/ ]

NOTE:  All messages from this email address should be digitally signed with my
       0xDC0DD409 GPG key. It is available on the pgp.mit.edu keyserver as
       well as other keyservers that sync with MIT's.
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]