[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora spin from RpmFusion



Bill Nottingham wrote:

The guidelines were specifically designed so that someone could ship
stock Fedora and an additional repository of vendor packages, whether
it be Dell addons, Creative Commons content or whatever.
If those guidelines are followed, then, without actually changing the
guidelines, it doesn't really matter what that content/packages are.

That is indeed my implicit question. Do you still want vendors to ship software not included in Fedora and still call it Fedora? Is it ok for anyone and everyone to do so with any set of software? Does the current trademark guidelines match the goals of the project?

Rahul


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]