[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Feature or bug? (strange?) yum behaviour



2008/4/2, James Antill <james fedoraproject com>:
>
>  On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 13:36 +0200, Mark wrote:
>  >  What i was saying
>  > here is that yum first needs to download/update it's local data to
>  > tell something that it could have easily done with rpm -q gimp.
>
>
>  For:
>
>   yum list installed gimp
>
>  ...current upstream is now fixed and won't download/update the repo.
>  metadata, "yum list installed" hasn't for a long time but any extra
>  args. broke the test (and yes, this would have been better as a BZ ...
>  but thanks anyway :).
>

BZ's are (nearly) always better but i wasn't sure yet if it was a bug
(like the title of this topic says).

And no problem.
Thanx for fixing it.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]