very common kernel modules slow down the boot process
Konrad Meyer
konrad at tylerc.org
Mon Apr 7 22:22:17 UTC 2008
Quoth Jonathan Underwood:
> On 07/04/2008, Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 19:48 +0000, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?
J=F3hann_B._Gu=F0mundsson _ wrote:
> > > So exactly what, of Alan suggestions are not necessary for a 128MB (
low
> > > men machine )
> > > And how do you come to the conclusion that he's throwing hate at
fedora?
> >
> >
> > First, the post was about less than 512, and my ps3 certainly has less
> > (256). A network install using rescue.img (renamed to netinst.iso or
> > boot.iso partway through the F9 development process) and nfs or http
> > works fine for me. I may have to do text or vnc installs, I don't
> > recall. Also selecting fewer packages helps, but you want fewer
> > packages anyway. For 128 it may get harder, I haven't tried that small
> > in a while, but that's a far cry from < 512.
>
>
> There used to be a project whose aim was to install Fedora on low
> memory machines - the approach was to use a different installer. For
> the life of me I can't remember or find the name of that project
> though.
RULE / Slinky. http://rule-project.org/
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080407/9a51fa2a/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list