Xfce SIG?

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Wed Apr 9 04:12:06 UTC 2008


On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:18:53 -0500
mike at cchtml.com (Mike Cronenworth) wrote:

> Hi Kevin,
> 
> I was thinking about this for a while, and I would like to show my
> interest.

Excellent. 

> You may or may not remember me from the times I've emailed you about 
> XFCE, but I am a full time XFCE user. I've also dabbed at directly 
> communicating with the XFCE group (bug reports, etc). Unfortunately
> my time for actual coding is light, so I may not be able to be
> productive but I would like to be involved.

Every bit helps. ;) 

> Also something to consider is to reach out to the XFCE group and the 
> Xubutnu group to collaborate more uniformly. It seems that the
> Xubuntu group rarely talks to the XFCE group, and the XFCE group
> rarely speaks to anyone outside. XFCE has good design models in place
> and it would be a shame for KDE and Gnome to keep this good project
> buried in publicity.

Yeah, it would be good for everyone to work closely with upstream. :)

Lets see if there is enough interest for a SIG here, and no matter
what, please do keep reporting bugs and helping when and where you can. 
All contributions welcome. 

> Regards,
> Mike

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080408/127fe755/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list