monodevelop snafu
Jesse Keating
jkeating at j2solutions.net
Thu Apr 17 01:39:44 UTC 2008
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 18:26 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote:
> With regard to my recent rebuilding of f-spot, I did check the builds
> by downloading manually from koji: the new mono-addins and f-spot work
> OK together, that is, f-spot can find the mono-addins just fine, so
> things seem OK at runtime.
>
Eeek, I didn't mean to apply that all the people working on it were
doing as such. I know you were testing the results of f-spot stuff, and
we all appreciate it!
> As for monodevelop, I didn't work on that particular package, so I
> don't know if the new mono-addins had any indirect effects on
> monodevelop (in theory it shouldn't). You could always drop back to
> the older mono-addins and see if that makes monodevelop work just to
> narrow down the cause. But yes, as Jesse said, we need to make things
> move forward from here.
>
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (jkeating.livejournal.com)
Fedora Project (fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080416/037caa93/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list