CLA is broken (was: Re: packages without internet source in fedora)
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Mon Apr 21 15:29:10 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 16:49 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:21:52PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > [...] (having to sign the Fedora CLA [...]
>
> speaking about CLA (and putting aside the fact that it is
> _yet_another_ document to read instead of real work), I have to
> witness that I have had problems signing it.
>
> To quote from it:
>
> 2. [...] You hereby grant [...] to recipients of software distributed by the
> Project:
> (a) a [...] copyright license to [...] prepare derivative works of,
> [...], sublicense, and distribute your Contribution and such
> derivative works;
>
> So it seems that if I write some code and submit it to Fedora, and if
> X then downloads Fedora with this code, then X has full rights to
> create a derivative work and distribute it under a non-free license.
>
> IOW, if I push something to Fedora, I'm effectively giving up my
> rights to the code. The fact that the whole project is licensed
> under, say, GPL is not relevant for new contributions.
That is absolutely incorrect. The CLA does not supersede the licensing
of your code.
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080421/542f14fd/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list