FCoA [Was: Re: FESCO]

Denis Leroy denis at poolshark.org
Sun Apr 27 08:08:56 UTC 2008


Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 08:55:16AM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
>> So, should be there a Fedora Court of Arbitration? ;-) I mean seriously, 
>> in so huge and disintegrated body as Fedora community is now, conflicts 
>> are bound to happend, and we may need some semi-official means of 
>> settling them.
> 
> It is already the case. The rule is more or less, bring it to the lists
> and then to fesco. But this is costly so having propoer guidelines to
> follow like AWOL are better.

Hmm why is it costly ? I've had a few conflicts resolved that way, and 
in a reasonably speedy fashion. I don't think I've ever seen a call for 
help on fedora-devel-list going unanswered...

Going over this thread this morning, it read something like this :

13:21 [a]: I quit because of this problem I didn't tell anyone about!
13:23 [b]: It's an outrage! What is FESCo doing ?!?
13:25 [Fesco]: ¿ Qué ?




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list