[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Orphaning package

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:28:08 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:

> I'm so fed up with this (people not responding to trivial to fix bugs / bugs 
> with patches attached) that I _regulary_ put a comment like this in bugzilla:
> Can you please fix this, this blocks X other bugs. I'm sorry todo this, but
> consider this your first ping in the light of the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMaintainers
> Which sometimes gets people attention and sometimes not. I guess the 
> NonResponsiveMaintainers policy is already an answer to this, which is why I 
> use it, but I wonder if it is _the_ answer.

It's the AWOL procedure, and it assumes that the maintainer doesn't

It doesn't cover the case, where a maintainer shows up from time to time,
but still doesn't take the requested/recommended action (such as applying
a patch or upgrading to a new upstream release).

And it boils down to FESCo deciding on how to proceed, which is exactly
what is needed in the non-AWOL cases, too.

Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) - Linux
loadavg: 1.05 1.20 1.37

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]