FCoA [Was: Re: FESCO]

[Jesse Keating]

On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 11:04 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:08:56AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote:
> >
> > Hmm why is it costly ? I've had a few conflicts resolved that way, and in a 
> > reasonably speedy fashion. I don't think I've ever seen a call for help on 
> > fedora-devel-list going unanswered...
> 
> It doesn't scale. I sent my personal experience in 
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2008-February/msg00496.html
> since then some bugs have been closed, but not all and I certainly reopened 
> at least the same number of similar bugs getting unhandled. And remember 
> how Michael Schwendt reacted to having his rightly reported bugs to be
> closed.
> 
> Reporting the bugs packagers don't care about on the fedora-devel list
> or to fesco is not right. Ther should be a way to oblige maintainers
> without bothering everyone.
> 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMaintainers

Please feel free to help make this better.

> --
> Pat
> 
-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (jkeating.livejournal.com)
Fedora Project          (fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080427/cac8687a/attachment.sig>