FCoA [Was: Re: FESCO]

Josh Boyer jwboyer at gmail.com
Mon Apr 28 15:48:08 UTC 2008


On 4/28/08, Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:51:46PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 10:02:11 +0200, Patrice Dumas scripst:
> > > It is already the case. The rule is more or less, bring it to the lists
> > > and then to fesco. But this is costly so having propoer guidelines to
> > > follow like AWOL are better.
> >
> > Sure, but FESCO seems to be a little overloaded with just general
> > leadership stuff (deciding about features, etc.).
>
> That's exactly my point. For such issues, a specific guideline which
> allows not to involve FESCo would be better.

I respectfully disagree.  A _better_ solution would be for FESCo to
spend less time deciding features, and more time focusing on community
issues and development.

josh




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list