AWOL Maintainer: Krzysztof Kurzawski

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Mon Aug 11 14:28:59 UTC 2008


On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 09:59 +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> 
>  Well, I think it's always better to use common sense rather than
>  blindly follow any policy.

And common sense to me says fix the package before the next freeze
deadline, rather than waiting for some cursory nod from the owner.

> 
> > agree that it is a good idea. I am sure there are good reasons,
> > specially when there's an active developer wanting to do some work
> on
> > it.
> 
>  Our CVS (usually -- depends on pkg.acl) is open. Nobody has to wait.
>  Go ahead and contribute.

Maybe for your packages, but certainly not every Fedora package.  A
goodly number of them have overly restrictive permissions set (something
I'm trying to address), and many will likely continue to have
restrictive permissions set on them.

Anything less than 3 weeks is far far to long to fit in with Fedora's
release cycle.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080811/bcdcaae6/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list