Looking for new package owners

[Vasile Gaburici]

I can take autotrace and mftrace. I'm about to package more font
generation tools, i.e. mf2pt1 and metatype1. But I have yet to be
sponsored, so it will take a while...

fig2ps should probably be left in the cold, there much better options
for making drawings in/for LaTeX these days. Besides the rpm dates
back to fc7.

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Deji Akingunola <dakingun at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Quentin Spencer <qspencer at ieee.org> wrote:
>> It's becoming clear to me that I lack the time to maintain all of my
>> packages, as there are a few outstanding bug reports that I'm just not
>> getting to. I think it's time to hand off some or all of my packages to new
>> maintainers. The following is the list of my current packages.
>>
>> atlas
>> autotrace
>> cln
>
> I'll take 'atlas' and 'cln' .
> Thanks.
>
> Deji
>
>> fig2ps
>> fftw
>> ginac
>> glpk
>> lilypond
>> lilypond-doc
>> mftrace
>> octave
>> octave-forge
>> suitesparse
>>
>> Some of these are really easy, but two of them could be somewhat
>> challenging. Octave-forge is getting big and ugly, and it really needs to be
>> split into about 40 subpackages (which could be done incrementally, rather
>> than all at once). Atlas is more or less working but it is really outdated,
>> and it would probably require almost starting from scratch to package the
>> new 3.8.x releases.
>>
>> Quentin
>>
>> --
>> fedora-devel-list mailing list
>> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>>
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
>