[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Looking for new package owners



> I'm not familiar with lilypond, but that page you linked is 404...

Sorry, typed from another monitor, and I fat-fingered it:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=789014

> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Jon Ciesla <limb jcomserv net> wrote:
>>
>>> I can take autotrace and mftrace. I'm about to package more font
>>> generation tools, i.e. mf2pt1 and metatype1. But I have yet to be
>>> sponsored, so it will take a while...
>>
>> Thanks Quentin!
>>
>> Vasile, my koji devel build of lilypond dies during an mftrace step.  Do
>> you have any insight?  Might mftrace need a rebuild?  A newer version is
>> available anyway. . .
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskingo?taskID=789014
>>
>>> fig2ps should probably be left in the cold, there much better options
>>> for making drawings in/for LaTeX these days. Besides the rpm dates
>>> back to fc7.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Deji Akingunola <dakingun gmail com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Quentin Spencer <qspencer ieee org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> It's becoming clear to me that I lack the time to maintain all of my
>>>>> packages, as there are a few outstanding bug reports that I'm just
>>>>> not
>>>>> getting to. I think it's time to hand off some or all of my packages
>>>>> to
>>>>> new
>>>>> maintainers. The following is the list of my current packages.
>>>>>
>>>>> atlas
>>>>> autotrace
>>>>> cln
>>>>
>>>> I'll take 'atlas' and 'cln' .
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Deji
>>>>
>>>>> fig2ps
>>>>> fftw
>>>>> ginac
>>>>> glpk
>>>>> lilypond
>>>>> lilypond-doc
>>>>> mftrace
>>>>> octave
>>>>> octave-forge
>>>>> suitesparse
>>>>>
>>>>> Some of these are really easy, but two of them could be somewhat
>>>>> challenging. Octave-forge is getting big and ugly, and it really
>>>>> needs
>>>>> to be
>>>>> split into about 40 subpackages (which could be done incrementally,
>>>>> rather
>>>>> than all at once). Atlas is more or less working but it is really
>>>>> outdated,
>>>>> and it would probably require almost starting from scratch to package
>>>>> the
>>>>> new 3.8.x releases.
>>>>>
>>>>> Quentin
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> fedora-devel-list mailing list
>>>>> fedora-devel-list redhat com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> fedora-devel-list mailing list
>>>> fedora-devel-list redhat com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> fedora-devel-list mailing list
>>> fedora-devel-list redhat com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> novus ordo absurdum
>>
>>
>


-- 
novus ordo absurdum


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]