rpms/git/devel .cvsignore, 1.63, 1.64 git.spec, 1.70, 1.71 sources, 1.63, 1.64
Andreas Ericsson
ae at op5.se
Sat Aug 30 07:06:28 UTC 2008
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/git/devel .cvsignore, 1.63, 1.64 git.spec, 1.70, 1.71 sources, 1.63, 1.64
- Next message (by thread): rpms/git/devel .cvsignore, 1.63, 1.64 git.spec, 1.70, 1.71 sources, 1.63, 1.64
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:56:55AM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>>> Though an F-9 update will not. You just don't yank out commands
>>> like that from a stable release.
>> Yeah, I fully agree. And that said, is there a compelling reason to
>> push git-1.6.0 as an F9 update� (aside from "we always have to have the
>> very latest release" mantra that many users chant)? F9 should be fine
>> with git-1.5.6.x, shouldn't it?
>
> It fixes a security bug, but I think a later release of 1.5.6.x does as
> well.
>
Also, git 1.6 moves all the git-<commands> away from /usr/bin. Judging by
the reactions on the git mailing list from people who install from sources,
you'd be better off shipping 1.6.0 with F10 and stick with 1.5.6.x for F9.
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson at op5.se
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/git/devel .cvsignore, 1.63, 1.64 git.spec, 1.70, 1.71 sources, 1.63, 1.64
- Next message (by thread): rpms/git/devel .cvsignore, 1.63, 1.64 git.spec, 1.70, 1.71 sources, 1.63, 1.64
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list