[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14



On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 10:57:39 -0500, David Huff wrote:

> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Er, what exactly is the issue at hand?
> 
> I added "ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ppc alpha sparc armv4l noarch" to
> the spec file however it is still reporting broken dep of qemu for ppc64.
> 
> So either the rpm *is* being pulled in to the tree eventhough 
> ExclusiveArch is set,  or whatever is checking for broken deops is 
> reporting incorrectly.

Explain how you think the broken deps checker would be broken!
The package _is_ in the ppc64 tree, isn't it?

http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/10/ppc64/appliance-tools-003.9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm

Btw:

$ rpm -qp --qf '[%{exclusivearch} ]' appliance-tools-003.9-1.fc10.src.rpm 
i386 i486 i586 i686 pentium3 pentium4 athlon geode x86_64 ppc alpha sparc armv4l

I leave the 2nd part of the exercise to you. Find out whether "mash" evaluates
%exclusivearch.

> 
> -D
> 
> I know this is an old thread however I just got two more notifications 
> for two new RPMs:
> 
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>  > Your following packages in the repository suffer from broken 
> dependencies:
>  >
>  > package: appliance-tools-003.9-1.fc10.noarch from fedora-updates-10-ppc64
>  >   unresolved deps:
>  >      qemu-img
>  >
>  > Your following packages in the repository suffer from broken 
> dependencies:
>  >
>  > package: appliance-tools-002.8-1.fc9.noarch from 
> fedora-updates-testing-9-ppc64
>  >   unresolved deps:
>  >      qemu-img
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt fedoraproject org>
Fedora release 10 (Cambridge) - Linux 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i686
loadavg: 2.75 2.48 2.18


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]