[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14



On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 17:37 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Explain how you think the broken deps checker would be broken!
> The package _is_ in the ppc64 tree, isn't it?
> 
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/10/ppc64/appliance-tools-003.9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
> 
> Btw:
> 
> $ rpm -qp --qf '[%{exclusivearch} ]'
> appliance-tools-003.9-1.fc10.src.rpm 
> i386 i486 i586 i686 pentium3 pentium4 athlon geode x86_64 ppc alpha
> sparc armv4l

Looking at the spec itself, I see:

ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ppc alpha sparc armv4l noarch

I think that 'noarch' is throwing mash off when it's trying to determine
if a noarch package is suitable for an arch.  Please remove that and try
again (trying it in rawhide should be suitable to test mash before
pushing an update).

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]