[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: FHS violations



On Monday 01 December 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> I'd like to propose that above guideline is updated with a "MUST"
> clause: The rationale for deviating from the FHS must be given in
> a comment in the package .spec file.

+1


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]