[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14



Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 17:37 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Explain how you think the broken deps checker would be broken!
The package _is_ in the ppc64 tree, isn't it?

http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/10/ppc64/appliance-tools-003.9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm

Btw:

$ rpm -qp --qf '[%{exclusivearch} ]'
appliance-tools-003.9-1.fc10.src.rpm i386 i486 i586 i686 pentium3 pentium4 athlon geode x86_64 ppc alpha
sparc armv4l

Looking at the spec itself, I see:

ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ppc alpha sparc armv4l noarch

I think that 'noarch' is throwing mash off when it's trying to determine
if a noarch package is suitable for an arch.  Please remove that and try
again (trying it in rawhide should be suitable to test mash before
pushing an update).



If I take out noarch in the ExclusiveArch list the build will fail:
"error: Architecture is not included: noarch"

more info:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=968280

-D


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]