[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: FHS violations



On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 23:08 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > I think I've seen %_exec_prefix/%_target before (I can imagine that trying
> > to change that might result in symlink-hell), but a root-level directory
> > is strange. That one is also "established practice"?
GCC uses $PREFIX/$TARGET for cross-toolchains.

So, if a cross-toolchain uses --target=spu these files land in /usr/spu

Whether using --target=spu is a clever idea and whether this makes sense
is a different matter. IMNSHO, it is none of both.

> The top-level /spu (not in /usr) is weird indeed, I'm not sure where this
> comes from.
/spu is nonsense. I'd suggest to have FESCO block and withdraw this
package.

Ralf



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]