[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Runlevels after F10 install



On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:43:14AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 14:30 -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > Shouldn't installing X make runlevel 5 the default?
> 
> No.

That's fine. I wasn't sure how it ought to proceed.

> > And, even if we don't install X, why should't services toggle their
> > runlevel 5 state?
> 
> This seems to be the interesting part.  This... shouldn't happen.

Agreed. I wasn't sure which component owned the services
configuration, so thought I'd float this here before logging a BZ
ticket.

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. - http://www.redhat.com/
oVirt - Virtual Machine Management - http://www.ovirt.org/
"What do you care what other people think, Mr. Feynman?"

Attachment: pgpGNJdpDqAAL.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]