[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Runlevels after F10 install



Darryl L. Pierce (dpierce redhat com) said: 
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:43:14AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 14:30 -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > > Shouldn't installing X make runlevel 5 the default?
> > 
> > No.
> 
> That's fine. I wasn't sure how it ought to proceed.

If you install a desktop, anaconda will modify the default runlevel.
(This may be limited to GNOME or KDE.) Otherwise, we don't touch it.

> > > And, even if we don't install X, why should't services toggle their
> > > runlevel 5 state?
> > 
> > This seems to be the interesting part.  This... shouldn't happen.
> 
> Agreed. I wasn't sure which component owned the services
> configuration, so thought I'd float this here before logging a BZ
> ticket.

Nothing should specifically change for runlevel 5 from the defaults.

Bill


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]