[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rawhide report: 20081128 changes



On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 07:27:12AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> It's more about not flooding the rawhide reports with a sea of OCaml
> broken dep emails.  That decreases readability for others looking for
> things they can fix.  (Aside from the primary concern of just wanting
> to get OCaml fixed too.)

Isn't it redundant for the rawhide report to show more than one broken
package dependency anyway?  Certainly if the deps that are broken come
from the same package ...

Anyway, I'm rebuilding some now.

Rich.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]