Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X?

[Patrice Dumas <pertusus free fr>]

On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 06:09:57PM -0600, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>
> expect to see third-party flavors of CMake (the way you see various  
> vendor versions of e.g. sed, which have no relation to each other  
> besides the degree to which they implement the POSIX spec for such tool).

Why so? There could be a solaris cmake, an IRIX cmake, an HP-UX cmake...

> Again, *what* "vendor cmake"? There is no such thing.

There could be. Why are there vendor sh, sed and awk?

> Cost of porting CMake: on POSIX platforms, about the same as autotools  
> or better, and unlike autotools, doable for non-UNIX-like platforms.

All the GNU POSIX utilities are portable and have been ported on many
platforms. 

I don't know exactly where to check, but I guess that there were even VMS 
versions of GNU sed, awk and so on, and also apollo versions and so on.

--
Pat