[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: The looming Python 3(000) monster



On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 10:06 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Michael DeHaan <mdehaan redhat com> wrote:
> >
> > We're just now dealing with Python 2.6, but over on the radar is perhaps one
> > of the most incompatible upgrades to the language we've seen in Python 3.  I
> > personally haven't tried it yet, but it /aims/ to be incompatble, which is
> > perhaps one of the most glaring signs a language designer has lost it that
> > I've seen.
> 
> 
> Was that last line really necessary for your post?

The implicit looming flamewar here should be taken upstream. Fedora
policy is to follow upstream, wherever it may take us.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]